by foulksy
ferris1971 wrote:
After playing a few My problem with the OP is the same problem I have with every post on every new game by a new player stating that in their 2 hours of reviewing the game they've decided that it's broken. Go look at every single game in BGG and you'll find someone trying to apply 'balancing' house rules after a hand full of games. The truth is it's just usually not necessary. USUALLY, a few more plays is all they really need. It gets a little old, so if I seem a little snarky, you'll just have to excuse me. I've heard this song and dance a few too many times... I'll bet a million dollars/deutsche marks it'll happen again.
This 100% - it seems someone would have have to have huge levels of hubris to decide after a couple of games that they had discovered that a game (a game with probably hundreds or even thousands of platest hours) was fundamentally flawed.